joe
03-02-2012, 12:02 PM
Exotic trout and other cutt types were stocked on top of existing populations of the Alvord Basin Cutthroat trout. These stockings have caused the loss of this trout in pure form. The Alvord Cutthroat Phenotype ((ACP), phenotype means what this trout looks like) is what currently remains of this trout and is now only known to exist in one tiny stream in Oregon. The problem is Lahonton CT and Humboldt CT were stocked in the same stream as the pure Alvords. All the trout in this tiny stream are slowly becoming what I call “Mutt Cutts”. The following website is an amazing work of art, both written and pictorial, explaining the saga of the Alvord CT and calling for help. In the latest Feb. 28th, 2012 narrative, I saw that the Oregon F&G has a possible change to their 2013 fishing regulations based on my response and likely by others with similar responses (see below).
http://kortumofdiscovery.wordpress.com/2012/02/
My October 2011 response on a way to help this trout:
I have been following the Alvord Phenotype discussion since the Nevada F&G Dept. tried to move the Alvord Phenotypes (AP) from Virgin Ck. to Jackson Ck. If the Nevada G&F had left the Alvord phenotypes in Virgin CK. and made the larger effort to remove the non-AP, I believe the project would have had more success based on hindsight. Because I am not aware of any on-stream action taking place to save the AP in G---- CK. Oregon, it seems to me that a bare minimum plan of action would be to mechanically remove the non-AP by angling. This would buy time until government folks have an action plan in place, if ever, because the AP is not a pure species. If the take "no action" is the government plan then I would feel much better that mechanical removal was being used by anglers which would help reduce further degradation of the remaining AP. I really like the AP website of Dave Kortum.
Joe D
http://kortumofdiscovery.wordpress.com/2012/02/
My October 2011 response on a way to help this trout:
I have been following the Alvord Phenotype discussion since the Nevada F&G Dept. tried to move the Alvord Phenotypes (AP) from Virgin Ck. to Jackson Ck. If the Nevada G&F had left the Alvord phenotypes in Virgin CK. and made the larger effort to remove the non-AP, I believe the project would have had more success based on hindsight. Because I am not aware of any on-stream action taking place to save the AP in G---- CK. Oregon, it seems to me that a bare minimum plan of action would be to mechanically remove the non-AP by angling. This would buy time until government folks have an action plan in place, if ever, because the AP is not a pure species. If the take "no action" is the government plan then I would feel much better that mechanical removal was being used by anglers which would help reduce further degradation of the remaining AP. I really like the AP website of Dave Kortum.
Joe D